Section I: The basics on sex Hormones
(steroids): [Mainly from Wikipedia articles,
2007]:
There are 3 classes sex hormone, estrogens, androgens, and
progesterones. “The polypeptide
hormones luteinizing hormone, follicle-stimulating hormone and gonadotropin-releasing hormone are
usually not regarded as sex hormones, although they play major sex-related roles”
Wiki. Estradiol is made by gonads, adrenal glands
and in some other tissues such as the liver, fat, and glial cells of the brain
where estradiol is an important neural steroid. “Estrogens
are a group of related compounds named for their importance in the estrous
cycle of humans and animals. They
are the primary female sex hormones.
Natural estrogens are steroid
hormones, while some synthetic ones are non-steroidal. The
name comes from the Greek
οἶστρος (oistros), literally meaning "gadfly" but figuratively
sexual passion or desire, and the suffix -gen,
meaning "producer of". Estrogens
are synthesized in all vertebrates as well as some insects thus having an
ancient history. Like all steroid
hormones, estrogens readily diffuse across the cell
membrane and some organelles such as the mitochondria. Once
inside the cell, they bind to and activate estrogen
receptors which in turn modulate the expression
of many genes.[4] Additionally, estrogens have been shown
to
activate a G protein-coup led receptor, GPR30. The four major naturally occurring estrogens
in women are (E1) estrone, (E2)
estradiol, (E3) estriol, and (E4) esterol.
Estradiol (E2) is the predominant estrogen
during reproductive years both in terms of free serum levels as well as in
terms of estrogenic activity. Estradiol is about 10 times as potent as estrone and
about 80 times as
potent as estriol in its estrogenic effects. Estrone is secreted by the ovary, adipose
[fat] tissue, and placenta. E1 as
sulfate it acts as a reservoir that can be converted as needed to estradiol.[1] During menopause,
estrone is the predominant circulating estrogen; while Estriol is during pregnancy
in terms of serum levels. It goes from
near zero to the dominate estrogen during pregnancy and blocks the effects of
estradiol. Estradiol is
the most important estrogen in
non-pregnant females who are between the menarche and menopause stages of life.
A 4th type of estrogen called estetrol (E4) is produced only during pregnancy. All of the different forms of estrogen
are synthesized from cholesterol which also produces androgens,
specifically testosterone and androstenedione,
by the enzyme aromatase. Follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH)
stimulates the ovarian production of estrogens by the granulosa
cells of the ovarian follicles and corporalutea. Some estrogens are also produced in smaller
amounts by the liver,
[the brain & fat cells], adrenal
glands, and the breasts. Androstenedione has weak androgenic activity
[muscle building] & is the predominant precursor for the more potent androgens
such as testosterone as well as estrogen. Among estrogen’s over 2-dozen bodily
functions. E.g., their lowering the
remodeling threshold prevents osteoporosis.
Estrogens are distributed in most
tissues, especially the breast, uterine, vagina, and has a high affinity to
adipose tissue., and is also maid by the glia cells in the brain. Estrogens
are metabolized in the liver and
excreted as metabolites by the kidney.
Their levels are tightly controlled. With receptors for estrogens in
every cell and
also in the mitochondria and the significant amount of the hormones circulating
premenopausal it must be salubrious, and has functioned to make us healthy in the
paleo state.
Extensive
oxidative damage and glycation by fructose affects the mitochondria and thus
autophagy, and its ATP production, this is the primary causal factors for
conditions associated with the western diet (once commonly called conditions
of affluence). The principle sex
hormones reduce such damage. But for senior this reduction in ATP caused by damage
to the mitochondria cause the age related conditions that are rare for
populations on a low sugar diet. [2]
All estrogens modulate the expression of many
genes, with some such as
GPER30 being only turned on by estradiol.
GPER30 has high expression in the pituitary gland, hypothalamus, adrenal
medulla, kidney medulla, breast epithelial tissue, and developing follicles of
the ovaries.[3] Mainly estradiol effect the GPER
transcription factors that turn on a number of genes of which affects lipo
storage, bone remodeling, and glucose tolerance; and there are other affected
transcription factors. Given the
complexity, without strong evidence it is safest to use the natural hormone in
a tri-phasic formulation or simple lotion.
Taking NHRT will continue the health benefits associated with
progesterone and & estradiol as one ages.
Estradiol and dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA)
another vital sex hormone during menopause and andropause sharply
declines. Women have about 1/10th
the level of testosterone as men, obtain from conversion of estradiol which
differs from testosterone by one functional group. As estradiol drops with
menopause so too does testosterone to which about 10% of estradiol is converted
to testosterone to maintain muscle mass. A small amount of testosterone is good,
and
once widely used in HRT formulation popular in Europe. The benefits of natural HRT are to slow
the clock of aging. The youthful estradiol level is > 300 pmol/L, or >
80 pg/mL. Given lower bioactive with age, a higher level,
probably double, is better. Section three lists the health benefits with links to journal articles.
Estrogen
receptors (ERs): for a sex steroid to affect cell functions there
must be receptors on or within the cell which effect functions. “ERs are
a group of proteins found
inside cells. They are receptors that are activated by the hormone estrogen (17β-estradiol).[1] Once activated by estrogen, the ER is able to
translocate into the nucleus and bind to DNA to
regulate the activity of different genes (i.e. it is a DNA-binding transcription factor). However, it also has
additional functions independent of DNA binding” Wiki. A bioidentical hormone, is quite different
than the natural one and inferior because evolution has evolved the most salubrious
set of functions over hundreds of millions of years sculptured for the unique
environment of that species. Pharma and
herbalist tell us their imitation is better, but with quality
confirmation. The history of
pharmacology is full of harmful difference.
Don’t mess with MOTHER NATURE! The
natural exception of raising hormone level bioactivity to useful levels is to daily
the culling from the village evolution inherited. Because the bioactivity is
lower with age,
the maximal benefit is above youthful. Moreover,
plants haven’t evolved phytoestrogens to promote the health of the mammals that
graze upon them. For this reasons, it is
prudent to avoid them as they promote the survival of plants because the
markerters of phytoestrogens synthetic hormones aren’t looking for side effects.
Estriol
and estrone the other two common estrogens.
Estradiol is about 10 times as
potent as estrone and about 80 times as potent as estriol in its estrogenic
effects. They have other functions
such as down regulation of some
estrogenic effects during pregnancy (estriol)
and during and post menopause along with estrone.[4] “Estrone can be converted into estradiol,
and
serves mainly as a precursor or metabolic intermediate of estradiol” Wiki. Both estrogens, E4 and
E3 go to ER receptors there blocking estradiol, and have much lower estrogenic
effects. Estrone is a precursor to
estradiol, though the rate of conversion as it changes with age has not been recorded.
Very little is known about their functions, and
what little is known is their affinity for ER receptors. Their action is far
thinly researched, much
thinner than estradiol. There role appears
to be regulatory upon estradiol during periods such as menopause, manache,
pregnancy, and post menopause.
Progesterone (P4) is the most important
of a class of hormones called progestogens. [Wiki lists 12 major effects
of progesterone. They are structurally
similar to the estrogens.] The
recognition of progesterone's ability to suppress ovulation
during pregnancy spawned a search for a similar hormone that could bypass the
problems associated with administering progesterone [low orally bioavailability,
except in oil or lotion]. A progestin is a synthetic progestogen
that has pregestational effects similar to progesterone. The two most common uses of progestins are
for hormonal contraception (either alone or with
an estrogen),
and to prevent endometrial hyperplasia [excess growth in
the uterus] from unopposed estrogen. In
mammals, progesterone, like all other steroid hormones, is synthesized
from pregnenolone,
which in turn is derived from cholesterol in a
very complex bio-system“ (Wiki 2009, more,
journals ). Statins in block 40% cholesterol synthesis
also block the hormones and much more.
Lowering the production of cholesterol though profitable for pharma has
many pathogenic health effects including those from lowering estrogens,
testosterone, and progesterone. Statins
lowers only in very flawed
clinical trials ischemic events. Basic
science on the vital subject of hormones is 95% driven by marketing, basic
science is thin and mostly done decades ago.
Bad
pharma: The
Pharmaceutical industry’s (pharma) prime
goal is the maximization of profits; thus, public’s health is their hype. I
call this tobacco ethics and science.
To know how broken the system is read Marketing
Science, on the FDA , how doctors
are their pawns, and watch Prof. Angell. The attack on HRT follows the pattern
of
eliminating an off-patent drug that reduces profits especially when they
prevent chronic conditions (see above).
[1]
Hormones when not actives are stored either as a sulfate or bound to a protein
typically SDGH or albumin
[2]
Fructose is 10 times more reacative than glucose, and it is metabolized after
glucose. Our western diet consumes over seven
times the amount of sugar that paleo peoples average, thus our rampant
conditons of affluence among the elderly.
[3]
Wikipedia GERP30, 4/2019
[4]
More bad phama, in that they call for the use of estriol in the HRT made by compounding
pharmacies, sold on the basis that it lowers the risk of breast cancer. However,
it is like with testosterone, only
when the E2 is low and then increased does the risk ofcancer in the sexual
ograns go up. The same has occurs with
testosterone and prostate cancer. Thus
pharma for both uses case of low sex hormone patients whose sex hormones are
then increased by HRT. The lowering of E2
is uaed to demonstrate the increase rate of growth for the cancer (the same
with testosterone). However, both high
E2 and testosterone actually lowers the risk for sex organ cancers. To artificially
lower the sex hormones only helps those who just prior had it raised, a rare
event. Thus over 90% of sex-organ
cancers patients are not helpeds by
blocking their sex hormones, rather they are harmed. .
Natural HRT
Benefits vs. Mare’s Urine Estrogen with MPA--the tragic differences
Setting
the record straight Prempro
vs. natural HRT --
for more
Section
II:
Tobaccos Science and Bad Press: Prempro, one of the first HRTs[1], has
been marketed since 1942 by Wyeth Laboratory (bought out by Pfizer in
2009). It has been and still is the
best-selling HRT. A supposedly
definitive study of HRT was done by the FDA’s drug
research branch, National Institute
of Health (NIH) (with
undoubtedly a nod from
pharma). The Women’s Health Initiative (WHI)
knowingly selected the worst
formulation of HRT, Prempro. NIH
had the results of the Hormone Estrogen
Replacement Study (HERS)
UK
completed in 1998 which used Prempro; moreover, earlier studies singled out (medroxyprogesterone)
MPA as the cause for the increased
risk of breast cancer (Goodman
& Gilman 2006, 1552). Prempro
consists of an estrogen cocktail derived from pregnant mare’s urine—7
unique mare estrogens-to
which is added the synthetic progestin MPA.
(The cruel treatment of mares and subsequent
slaughter was broadcast
by Frontline.) “Pregnant mare’s
estrogens are the weak estrone
(>50%), and the two mare estrogens, equilin (15-25%)
and equilenin…. Mare (equine) estrogens such as equilin,
that
are foreign to the human body, have been shown, when compared to other studies,
to have effects that are significantly worse than the natural estradiol[2].” MPA, the synthetic progestin used in
Prempro, blocks most of the beneficial
effects of estrogen--the natural progesterone doesn’t. Using Prempro,
the WHI found that compared to a
placebo there was increased incidents:
heart attacks 29%, breast cancer 26%, pulmonary embolism 113%, strokes
41%, total deaths 15%, all cancers 3%; reduced incidents: hip fractures
34% and colon cancer 37%.”
“MPA antagonizes this athero-protective
effect [arteries, including coronary]” at 1997. Though
“all causes of mortality were not effected”, the press highlighted risks for
HRT (undoubtedly with a nod from their biggest advertiser[3]), &
HRT sales plummeted. The equine estrogen only arm of WHI had better results; more proof that
adding MPA causes the harm. Pfizer in 2010 settled a suit over breast
cancer for $330 million or $150,000 per person.
Yet Prempro is still on the market (thank you FDA & pharma) and still
first in sales. Based on the WHI, NIH
issued this
warning on all HRTs: “…increased risk of myocardial infraction, stroke,
invasive breast cancer, pulmonary emboli, and deep vein thrombosis in
postmenopausal women… Estrogens with or
without progestins should be prescribed at the lowest effective doses and for
the shortest duration consistent with treatment goals…” The warning
is placed on all packages of HRT, and it is accepted
as correct by most doctors and patients. My doubts were confirmed when
attending a
lecture on the WHI given in 2002 at
UCSD by Professor Dr. Robert Langer. He
explained to a large medical audience that the WHI Prempro results cannot be validly
applied to other HRT formulas. Over 50 years of research was not overturned;
rather physicians and the public were tragically misled by the press, pharma, guidelines,
and the NIH. This is another example
of regulatory
capture. Tobacco ethics guides
pharma.
CONFIRMATION: Set Up to Fail
was published in the highly acclaimed science journal, Nature,
09/09/2010: “Is
Nature ignorant of the vital fact
that Prempro contains no
progesterone, but instead the artificial progestogen Provera [MPA]. The other component is Premarin (conjugated estrogen), which is a very
uncertain, patent mixture of substances from the urine of pregnant mares….
[equine (horse urine) estrogens] have crucially different effects. Prempro
is totally unrepresentative
of any other product used for HRT purposes…. . Much of it was
known before the NIH chose to use Prempro in its intended landmark study. Using a study of the
effects of Prempro to attack the entire use of
HRT has, through needless fear, caused
millions of women to forgo considerable benefits of HRT using better
products. This point has been repeatedly
made by endocrinologists. Why does Nature not
know it?--END OF ARTICLE.
"I think that it borders on a tragedy that Premarin
and Provera
[the 2 compounds in Prempro] were chosen as the only HRT treatments [for the
WHI Study]”. Another researcher finds
that Provera [MPA]--and no other progestin--blocks the mechanisms that allow
estrogen to fight the brain's immune response to Alzheimer's…. Bruce S. McEwen Neuroendocrinologist of the Rockefeller
University is unequivocally critical of the study: "I think that it
borders on a tragedy that Premarin and Provera were chosen as the only HRT
treatments." “With Medroxyprogesterone
[MPA] in Provera you are activating
two receptors involved with cell division in the breast," she says,
"and that's the culprit, not estrogen [for breast cancer].” Recent research
shows that Provera interferes with estrogen's ability to prevent memory loss
and dementia. “Estrogen is able to protect neurons
against toxic assaults that are associated with Alzheimer's disease,"
notes Roberta Diaz Brinton, a neuroscientist at the University of Southern
California…. she found “that
Provera--and no other progestin--blocks
the mechanisms that allow estrogen to fight the brain's immune response to
Alzheimer's”. This immune response wears away at brain cells and
causes them to leak neurotransmitters such as glutamate, which overloads and
kills neurons.” Hormone Hysteria,
Scientific
American Sept. 2003. “Premarin,
conjugated estrogen or conjugated equine estrogens[4]. Since it is from a pregnant mare, like with
mothers they make enough of an estrone to block the non-pregnant most
beneficial estradiol, namely estrone.
Thus there is a double whammy that of the progestin which is inferior to
the natural progesterone and the estrone” Wiki Nov 2012.
The
2008 study “Could
transdermal estradiol + progesterone by a sager postmenopausal HRT? A review confirms the criticism of the
WHI studies through an extensive review of existing research, while at the same
time strongly supporting the continued use of HRT in menopausal women because
of lowering the risk of degenerative diseases such as osteoarthritis,
rheumatoid arthritis, cardiovascular disease and their consequences, other benefits
include reduced risk of sarcopenia, osteoporotic fractures, diabetes,
hypertension, cognitive decline, sexual decline, and without the risks caused
by the synthetic HRT such as deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary thromboembolism, and
breast cancer. This study has been lost
in pharma dominated education and guidelines which has turned doctors into
dupes of pharma. Sadly and reluctantly, I have concluded that medical
science has been replaced with marketing pants that is wearing the language of
medical science. Following the business imperative
for quarterly profits pharma applies tobacco science and tobacco ethics thereby
putting profits come before people. We have
the greatest black man-made health disaster dressed as the miracle of modern science.
The number of drugs not worth their side
effects is the norm. Until the national
data banks for the real-world population are opened, the harm done and benefits
caused by the weird chemicals called drugs
won’t be known. Our high sugar diet has
damaged every cell, and thereby greatly increased our vulnerability.
[1]
First was DES
(diethylstilbestrol) a non-steroidal estrogen developed in 1938. Like Fleming
with penicillin, DES was not
patented because Dodds felt that scientists were working for the pubic, and it
was too important to deny cheap
availability
by patenting. Animal studies had in the
1930’s exposed DES serious side effects; but the industry relied upon human trials,
and the FDA on Sept. 19, 1942 approved DES though aware of the more
reliable animal studies. DES was
marketed under 200 brand names. Numerous
claims were made such as producing
healthier babies and preventing miscarriages. In 1971 DES was found to
cause a 40 fold
increase in cervical & vaginal cancers.
Later studies found several internal genital abnormalities in the
daughters and sons of mothers given DES. 26
years later In 1997 Eli Lilly stopped making and
marketing DES. DES was also the standard treatment for advance
prostate cancer for over 40 years. The
other early blockbuster HRT Prempro with
the progestin MPA has been shown to increase
the rate of growth of breast cancer.
So too does nonrethisterone and dienogest, but progesterone induces apoptosis,
at.
[2] Equilin blocks E1 and E2
receptors and thus would reduce the effectiveness of natural estrogens. Though
Prempro and Premarin (just equine
estrogen) are still the world’s leading HRT and ERT, no follow-up research was
done because the financial incentive is to hide side effects.
[3]
Pharma’s assault
on HRT is driven by their profits for
chronic conditions arising from osteoporosis, depression, arthritis, Alzheimer’s
disease and the assorted illnesses
and conditions related to atherosclerosis especially heart attacks, strokes,
and hypertension; an example of tobacco ethics.
[4]
s estrone 51%, equilin 24%, 17 alpha dihydroequilenin 15%, 17-alpha estradiol 4%,
equilenin 3.3%, and estradiol 1.1% at
textbook.
Section III: BENEFITS OF HRT Why are the sex steroids
(sex hormones) so beneficial for those with hypogonadism? I
lean heavily upon our ancestors living in villages, for most there is incessant
warfare with neighboring villages and/or clans.
The elderly being a burden because of their decline in functions to labor,
produce children, and fight (males), this entails that biological systems that removes
the elderly would be selected for. The
andropause and menopause occur in the 6th promotes their
elimination. Hormonal supplementation
counters the steroids role in the aging process, thereby improving quality of
life.
Mitochondrial
dysfunction: This explains all the
benefits below! Mitochondria have sex
hormone (including DHEA) receptors, that turn up the various processes that “is
mitochondrial protection.” At 2013, Optimal cellular functions entail an
adequate supply of the energy molecule ATP, which is what fats and
carbohydrates are used to make through their conversion acetyl-CoA and pyruvate
produced in the cytosol and then transported into the mitochondria to make the
essential ATP. EVERY PROCESS IN THE BODY RUNS ON ATP. Early, in 2018, I came to the realization
that the long list of conditions associated with the western diet had as a
starting point the reactive sugar fructose damaging mitochondrial DNA. Subsequent
investigation found that the sex
hormones TTT and estradiol are mitochondrial protective re reactive chemicals,
and this is the mechanism behind their long list of benefits. “Both
steroids trigger a complex molecular mechanism that involves crosstalk between
the mitochondria, nucleus, and plasma membrane, and the cytoskeleton plays a
key role in these interactions. The result of this signaling is mitochondrial
protection”, at Sept
2013. “Our
results indicate that testosterone improves cell survival and mitochondrial
membrane potential and reduces nuclear fragmentation and reactive oxygen
species (ROS) generation. These effects
were accompanied by a positive regulation of neuroglobin, an oxygen-binding and
sensor protein, which may serve as a regulator of ROS and nitrogen reactive
species (NOS), . . . these findings
suggest
that astroglia may mediate some of the protective actions of testosterone in
the brain upon pathological conditions” at
June 2016 and similar for cytoprotection and cardiac recovery after MI, at
2004. Overall benefits through
signaling and turning on DNA is covered in an 2011 seminal
article. All three very similar in structure
hormones,
testosterone, DHEA, and estradiol have similar protective functions. Unfortunately,
the industry that profits from
illness has opposed their usage and does tobacco science to “educate”
physicians and the public that hormonal interventions has major “risks” and
minimal benefits, while at the same time ignoring studies that contradict their
findings. We have gone from the golden
age of medicine back to the snake-oil era now dressed in the language of
science and clinical trials. The devil
is buried in pharma’s details. Sadly I have come to realize the corruption worked
by an industry that profits from illness and has created pill pushers and pill
poppers—for some examples, and.
Alzheimer’s disease with past
long-term
HRT, 7 vs
30 control. Estrogen is neuro-protective by inhibiting oxidative damage. Progesterone
is also neuro-protective: used in large
doses following trauma “to limit central nervous system damage.”
Again MPA in WHI study increased risk of dementia, 40 cases of dementia
versus 21 in the placebo group, at. . A
study of hypoxia and DHEA, TTT, and estradiol and their metabolite
epiandrosterone (EPIA) found only EPIA neuro-protective. This helps to explain
why the method why some have failed to find estradiol neuroprotective.
Breast density maintained for women on HRT.
The difference has been repeatedly noted on mammograms.
Cognitive
Function: “There are
plausible biological
mechanisms by which estrogen might lead to improved cognition.” Estradiol surpasses
oxidative stress in the
brain’s mitochondria, thus increasing ATP needed for optimal function, at
2007.
Sexual Satisfaction: prevents vaginal atrophy, “HRT improves sexual function” better,
estradiol &
testosterone, &.
Cancer
breast et al risk decreased: 73% less for estradiol:
“in breast cancer 10 in treated group v 17 in control
group.” HRT after & also during breast cancer
greatly increases
survival, also
ratio 0.28, and 53% increase-results
would be better estradiol with
progesterone. “MPA (in Prempro)
increases the risk of
breast cancer” some progestins increase risk.
Contrary to pharma, estradiol progesterone doesn’t increase
risk, and when given following
breast cancer
over 2/3rd
fewer deaths at 15 years HRT, and also,
also, same
for uterine
cancer. HRT also prevent skin cancer.
Colon cancer: “the
reduction among current users RR = 0.55… users of 11 years or more RR of
0.54 [46% lower, also].” Estrogen
and progesterone have beneficial
effects for “esophagus, stomach, gallbladder, and intestines.”
Breast cancer survival: “Cancers in women who use HRT are often less advanced,
and lower mortality has been reported in those who use HRT than in nonusers… The
association of HRT with lower
proliferation rate and smaller tumor size was exclusively caused by ER-positive
tumors” at. After diagnosis 72% higher survival: “The risk of
death was lower among the HRT survivors; odds ratio 0.28…” at, Also, breast cancer mortality rate of 5 per
1000 person years in HRT users compared to 15 in nonusers, at. This was explained,
along with the fact that women post-menopausal women on estradiol and those were
pregnant have a lower risk of breast
cancer in that their estradiol and estriol blocker estrone (E1) stimulates
cancer growth—at 1974.
For negative results, pharma used the progestin MPA (WHI study) which
blocks the cancer protecting and CVD
protecting effects of estradiol; other progestins could be similar; however,
“progesterone combined with estradiol induces apoptosis [cancer cell death]” at. So rather than go after the block buster
culprit estrone with E1-3-MTP (at 1993),
pharma blocks both estradiol its health benefits and estrone.
Cardiovascular disease (CVD) &
MI: “estrogen lowered … 37%
LDL …, extends life 2.1 years,”
Braunwald, Heart Disease 5th Ed, 97, p 1708. “HRT decreases CAD morbidity and CAD mortality
… was 0.56 compared to subjects not
taking estrogen” Braunwald 1142; another 50%, 16 vs 33, reduction in CHD. Estradiol blocks
oxidation of LDL to prevent atherosclerosis. “Estradiol completely
reverses the effects induced by OX-LDL on the DDAH/ADMA/NO pathway,” Avoid MPA and LNG (levonorgestrel). Another
study found 26 MI deaths for estradiol vs. 56 for placebo (115%).
A meta-study found and a 50% reduction of
Coronary Heart Disease. Lowers hypertension risk. Two AHA studies explain
mechanisms of cardio arteries protection and Wiki, also, Angina pain is associated with low
estrogen, treated. Calcification of arteries is strongly
associated with MI. HRT lower calcification
of coronary arteries—at, using Prempro.
Cholesterol
effects, percentage of reduction in LDL with E 37%, with E + PA 46% (E is
equine estrogen and PA is medroxyprogesterone Braunwald, Ed 6, Table
51-2). Estrogen significantly protect
LDL from oxidation at
. “E2
at a concentration of 1 μmol/L inhibited LDL oxidation by 37% to 62% at the
various concentrations of copper” at.
Oxidized LDL in the tunica media of the
artery is held to by pharma to be the major cause for atherosclerosis and CVD.
I DO NOT SUBSCRIBE TO THE LIPID
HYPOTHESIS,
statins are poison, wrong cause, and more, expert’s review on statins
as poison.
Diabesity,
which is both Obesity & Diabetes: the
drop of estradiol increases LPL which
regulates weight, distribution of fat, and activity. Gary Taubes, Good Calories, Bad Calories,
398, Taubes Why we Get Fat, 90-91,
and Wade at, In the obese estrone is +40% at. Weight related issues (metabolic syndrome, insulin resistance, & diabetes) are
associated with drop in estradiol, at. Likely mechanism is a reduction in the related
hormone DHEA whose metabolite (7-oxo-DHEA) promotes significant weight loss (at)
and is neuroprotective (at). Note, JK takes DHEA 40 mg sublingually;
it diminished
appetite for one hour, mild stimulant and avoid first–pass over 95% metabolism
by the liver which occurs with oral dose, no additional weight gain.
Endothelial
cell dysfunction prevented, the compromised performance of the single
layer of squamous cells lining all the blood that form an interface between
circulating blood content and interior tissue.
Their under-performance is responsible for over 95% of all cardiovascular
disease. Estradiol significant improves
the performance of these cells at 1996,
1996. “Hormone replacement with estrogen has been
shown to improve endothelium-dependent vaso-relaxation acutely in a number of animal
models, including primate coronary arteries (97)”
at 1999—relaxation a measure
of health. “Endothelial function is abnormal
in many postmenopausal women compared
with premenopausal women, and in some postmenopausal women it can be enhanced
by estrogen
replacement therapy. This effect may increase with prolonged use”
June 1998.
Longevity: Telomere numbers of units on the end of DNA are essential
for cell longevity and functionality—see Wiki.
It has been shown both in
animal and human studies that treatment with estradiol lengthens through action
on telomerase the number of telomere units, see careful matched study of HT
therapy, and, and, and,
for animals. This
action on telomerase in part explains the many benefits from estradiol as to
the protective effect in mitochondria.
Macular
degeneration, and hearing: HRT resulted
in a 36% reduction and other eye pathologies. Hearing
better.
Mental Health:
Estradiol like several hormones (DHEA and testosterone
and
probably others) have receptors in some
of the cells in the brain. For example, DHEA is produced in the brain. “Estradiol
has been found to be effective in the adjunctive treatment
of schizophrenia in women. It has been found to significantly reduce positive, negative, and cognitive symptoms, with particular benefits on positive symptoms.” Wiki 4/19.
Mitochondrial
protection as antioxidant: “Estrogens
have antioxidant properties which are due to their ability to bind to estrogen
receptors and to up-regulate the expression of antioxidant enzymes via
intracellular signaling pathways. . . . Recently, estrogen receptors were identified
in mitochondria at
2010. This function is at the heart of E2 benefits.
Mood elevation
and depression: “Numerous molecular and clinical studies have implicated estrogen in
modulating brain function including that related to mood,” treatment of mood disorders and
depression no
additional weight
gain.
NAFLD: “Non-alcoholic
fatty liver disease) is
also more common among men than women in all age groups until age 60, where the
prevalence between sexes equalize. This
is due to the protective nature of estrogen,” Wiki.—
diet's role.
Neurosteroids: “These
brain-mainly glia cells produces sex steroids that are labeled “neurosteroids”,
and have been found to exert important regulatory functions” at
2008. Among the neurosteroids
are pregnenolone, estradiol, testosterone, and DHEA and their storage form such
as DHEAS and pregnenolone sulfate. Those
just listed I have I have extensively reviewed their literature. There are over
a dozen other neurosteroids. As a senior I take sublingually or in lotion
3 of those hormones. They reduce the
risk of for age related neurodegenerative conditions and slow the rate of
cognitive decline (contrary to pharma’s warnings and the belief of most
physicians).
Osteoporosis and bone remodeling:
“Bone loss increases after menopause due to lower levels of estrogen.,. [causes removal of
ovaries” Wiki “Esterified
estrogens produced significant increases
in bone mineral density (lumbar spine, hip).
54.2%
greater spinal mineral. “1
of 4 white
women over the age of 60 had spinal compression fractures associated with
osteoporosis. One
woman of 5 will fracture a hip by the age of 90,” and even more will have knee
replacement operations. Bone gain from long-term
HRT, also;
estradiol's
role. Numerous journal articles hold that progesterone work with estradiol
to increase remodeling of bone, at, and, and. Estradiol slows the loss of bone calcium and
progesterone increase the rate of calcium replacement. Bisphosphonates drugs
increase bone density
by adding unnatural phosphate to the bones which result in an increased brittleness,
and “they disrupt intracellular enzymatic functions needed for bone
resorption” and they have other major side
effects. Including atrial fibrillation.
Osteoarthritis (OA): When both incident and progressive
radiographic knee OA
cases combined, “current ERT [estrogen only replacement therapy] use had a 60% decreased risk compared with never use”. Progesterone is most important.
Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA):
“HRT was well tolerated, increased
well-being, reduced articular index and increased lumbar spine bone density
over a one year period in postmenopausal women with RA” also,
& lowers RA CVD deaths.
Parkinson’s disease,” loss of estrogen resulted in decrease
neuron
density in the substantia nigra (structure of brain damaged by Parkinson’s
disease), and restoration of estrogen in increased density” at, and. Again MPA exacerbates condition & risk, at. Pharma of course does junk science to show
that HRT does not affect the course of the disease.
Programed death & longevity through menopause is to remove elderly women from the community,
thus
the precipitous decline in health of
women after menopause. To slow
this process requires the taking of natural HRT.
Sarcopenia
age related
loss of skeletal muscle mass with age is associated with low level of estrogen
& testosterone in 22.6%
in older postmenopausal women not receiving estrogen or TTT. TTT
prevents and
reverses sarcopenia, and;
however HRT alone does
not protect against muscle loss which is why I would add TTT to the
compounded formal. About 10% of estradiol is
converted to testosterone by the body for its androgen (muscle building) effect.
Skin
healthier American Journal of Clinical Dermatology & more hair, hair, hair. “Studies of
postmenopausal women indicate that estrogen
deprivation is associated with dryness, atrophy, fine
wrinkling, poor healing, epidermal thinning, declining dermal collagen content,
diminished skin moisture. The decrease was preventable by the use of HRT.” “The mean collagen content in the skin was … found
to be 48% greater”,
slows
skin aging, also, and less skin
cancer, 2008.
Urinary Tract
Infections Recurrent (UTI), also urinary urgency, urogenital & vaginal
atrophy are associated
with low estrogen in post-menopausal women.
A meta-analysis
of 8 quality studies found the placebo group 2.5 times more likely to have
a subsequent UTI. Topical
administration most effective; however for vaginal
atrophy estradiol tablets.
Venus Thrombosis: an 8% reduction in risk of with esterified
estrogen while those on
Prempro had a 65% elevated risk JAMA
04, and; a 23% reduction exogenous
estrogen (5.1% of cases versus 6.3% control cohort).
10 Reasons for
HRT: Menopause Int. & Oncology:
Both list the above benefits, and the latter
advises HRT for survivors of breast cancer because of “a 70% reduction in
the risk of death” during the 15 years, also.
The 4 other major sex hormones (DHEA,
progesterone, testosterone, and pregnenolone): What
is said of estradiol as to positive effects applies to testosterone, they follow
a similar evolutionary path, but for the degree of androgen effect (only about
10% of estrogen is converted to testosterone, thus its lower androgen
effect). In general, the cell
types which have estrogen
receptors have receptors for other
sex steroids, and often the combination is superior to supplementation with just
one of those steroids—see below recommendations.
Section IV, What I
would do if a woman: NHRT is part of nature’s
clock. NHRT sets the body’s
clock to premenopausal and thereby reduces the
rise for age-related chronic conditions.
The low level of estradiol causes
the precipitous decline after menopause.
Average life extension with long-term NHRT is over 6 year
based on above benefits and the Danish long-term trial,
which the BMJ reprinted a decade later to get the message out. NHRT
must be applied topically as a cream
from a compounding pharmacy and not as a pill, since when taken orally the
nutrients and other substances absorbed by the intestines travel through the
hepatic portal vein to the liver where the estradiol is converted to estrone,
the contraceptive form of estrogen.
Estrone goes to the ER-alpha and ER-beta estrogen receptors and blocks
estradiol activity. The creams should
contain at least 5 mg of estradiol and
100 of progesterone since absorptions
are but 10%. If some is applied
vaginally, the absorption is about 30%.
My former wife uses 30-gram of 0.15% monthly of lotion from the
compounding pharmacy to which she applies 1/4th teaspoon (1 grams)
over her upper torso while still wet following her shower (this permits by
spreading out the lotion better absorption). If concerned about muscle strength, add 30 mg of testosterone in lotion
to reverse sarcopenia,
androgen
deficiency, & to improve libido without reduction in
estradiol. Wikipedia (4/19) lists bioavailability
of E2 at <5%. The same applies to the
other sex steroids. I take testosterone
since 2004 topically as cream 375 mg daily, and DHEA sublingually 100 mg since
2002. 60% of estradiol is bound to
albumin and 38% to SJBG, and 2% is free.
Pregnenolone
and DHEA are
stored as sulfates, and the others are bound on proteins.
What to avoid and why: True to profits-first, corporate tobacco
ethics, pharma offers 1) HRT in too low a dose; 2) Some oral formulations of
estrogen don’t deliver estradiol, but rather the inferior estriol—which works
as birth control, but blocks estradiol healthful benefits; 3) synthetic
estrogens, horse estrogen, and synthetic progesterone (progestins) of
questionable value and safety; 4) Avoid pharma’s HRT in that they are probably
too low a dose and other tricks. For
example, in the US, Novo Nordisk markets is Vagifem, a vaginal inser; it is 10
mcg (yes, micrograms, 1/10th of a mg) of estradiol. At that dose it possible reduces vaginal
atrophy, but certainly won’t reduce risk for ischemic events, cancer,
Alzheimer’s diseases and so on. Their Nor
Disc pills marketed in 1990 had 2 mgs of estradiol; it in a 11 year follow-up
had 15 deaths compared to 26 in
the placebo group. Prescription
HRTs are likely to be too low a dose and/or with a pathogenic progestin. See
what my ex-wife takes below, a better
choice; 5) human estrogens estrone (E1), Estriol (E3), estetrol (E4) which are
less bioactive and they block some of the action of estradiol, the best
estrogen. Most doctors will look on
their computer and prescribe as a compounded lotion E3, E2, and
progesterone. E3 blocks the benefits of
E2 and has the side effects of tender breasts and nausea.[1] Probably the same with the addition
of E1 and E4; 6) Physicians responding to a patient’s request for compounded
lotion will likely use their computer for the formula. It will consist of a
cream which will have
both E2 and E3. E3 blocks E2, and causes
blotting and other side effects. I have
received reports from both Canada and the US of patients getting the same
combination—thank you, pharma; 7). For hot flashes, NIH guidelines include a
major tranquilizer (SSRI),estrogen blockers such as Tamoxifen, the
bisphosphonate Fosamax, estrone (as Estragyn) which is a very weak from of
estrogen that blocks estradiol, and Ropinirole a dopamine agonist thus promotes
lethargy and depression—all of them have made my do not take list.
“Current research
shows that the transdermal route of estradiol administration
can also be advantageous for women with diabetes, hypertension and other cardiovascular
risk factors, as those risks increase with advancing age” Wiki 2018,
at
2013, 2008.
“Oral HRT is associated with an increased risk
of venous thromboembolism (VTE), gallbladder disease and possibly stroke. The
increased occurrence of all these events
can be prevented by the use of the transdermal route of estradiol
administration; this route seems also advantageous for women with diabetes,
hypertension and other cardiovascular risk factors, and also especially with
advancing age” at.
This doesn’t apply to transdermal application
which avoids the high level of metabolic products generated by the liver that
are causal for those events, at
2008. If I was a woman, I would tell
my physician I don’t believe those risk apply to NHRT, and what risks there
are is outweigh by benefits, then give
him a copy 2010 journal article. There is a major difference between a pill
and a lotion, due to the action of the liver upon estradiol when taken orally. I’d
tell him I observed the benefits in a
friend & a relative and want the same.
Beware of hormone balancing; some doctors are milking the
patient. The evidence for this is weak
for postmenopausal women. Avoid
“bio-identical” plant estrogens and progesterones—they aren’t identical to
human sex hormones. These hormones occupy receptors with uncertain
action and possible block benefits, like MPA, and most have low bio-availability and even lower bioactivity. The
evidence for sequential HRT is moderate,
but it has a lower compliance because of vaginal bleeding (at 1997) and
it must be taken as a pill which entails the conversion of estradiol to estrone
(see above). There
is a lack of quality clinical
trials on them.[2]
However, both hormone balance and
sequential HRT are significantly better than going without HRT. Sequentialing
with progesterone is possible
the best choice—in need of clinical trials.
Estrogen is involved in both
weight regulation and fat distribution.
Low estrogen entails for most a gain in unhealthy visceral (adnominal)
fat. Reset your bio-clock with NHRT,
fix your diet, learn about
the corruption caused by pharma
(on YouTube), and why doctors
are their pharma’s pawns. For testimonials and more on osteoporosis, link.
Some of the neuroleptic psychiatric
drugs promote significantly catabolism of E2 (and possible other estrogens) through
upregulation of P-450 cytochrome, therefore a higher dose would be needed for
the estrogens. The research was only on
a few of those drugs, at
P 290. Though another topic, in most
cases it is best to avoid the neuroleptic drugs—another topic. If you
must use drugs to reduce boredom and
desire to reduce cognitive functions, it is better to use marijuana. Finally,
it is best to stay clear of pharma’s
HRT; the last time I looked at what was offered (2015), I wasn’t pleased. In
an era of search for drugs, there are 197
pounds listed in Wikipedia that are hormones, hormone derivates, or have hormonal
action; a gross example of searching for products. There are 159 combinations
of hormones,
130 estrogen
esters, and 67 estrogens. Money shouts, and basic science
whimpers. Not surprisingly with pharma intrusion
into education, doctors are
dupes of pharma, thus they are true believers who don’t know what is best
or harmful.
Testosterone
(TTT) alternative,
testosterone for women has a long history. Testosterone
has been used therapeutically in women for over 70 years. It was initially reported
to be beneficial in the management of a wide range of gynecological disorders
including menorrhagia, dysmenorrhea, mastalgia and even pelvic inflammatory
disease. Reports of a beneficial effect of testosterone therapy in treatment of
menopausal symptoms and female sexual dysfunction were published as early as
the 1950s at 2012 I uncovered its use instead
of progestins in
the 1980s and before in Europe. The use
of androgens by women though small in number has clear visual benefits. For
over a decade I favored the addition of TTT
to natural compounded HRT. More recently
I came across The Secret of Female Hormone, Kathy Maupin MD, 2014. She
has been using in her medical practice
for over 2 decades, and prefers it estradiol and progesterone. Though women
produce about 1/10th
the TTT that men do, it is In young women, the ovaries produce
approximately three- to four-times more testosterone than estrogen per day, at 2012. The
article The safety of Postmenopausal
Testosterone Therapy focusing particularly on the effects of
testosterone on breast, endometrium, cognitive functions (a neurosteroid), and
cardiovascular health. Given my years of
research of the sex homones, I would take if a woman, testosterone, trying it
out during menopause, and then taking a about
1.5 grams of 10% from a compounding pharmacy.
For full benefits aerobic exercise and weight training are significant pluses,
they stimulate its androgen effect. Mood
elevation and cognitive functions improved.
I would also take sublingually DHEA, another neorsteroid. Sublingually
to avoid liver metabolism. Two friends one in the late 60s the
other in the mid 80s are pleased with the results of both.
Personal
experience: At 79 I run over 60 miles a month, and do over3 hours a weight
training a week, and swim over 2 miles a week in the summer.. I am lean, and
still life the same weight I
did 30 years before, just longer gaps between set—mitochondiral decline in the
preduction of ATP. I wished had been on
a low sugar diet before the age of 71, the reactive fructose is a slow
poison. American average 7 times the average
for paleo peoples.The gov ernment figures is for manufactured sugar, not fruits
and fruit juices. To this I add antioxidants,
one 325 mg uncoated aspirin and the hormone DHEA taken sublingually. I have been taking DHEA since
2002 and testosterone since 2004 from a compounding pharmacy, and the DHEA powder
from Amazon.
[1]
“Estriol (E3), also spelled oestriol, is a steroid, a weak estrogen, and
a minor female sex hormone.[1][2] It is one of three major endogenous
estrogens, the others being estradiol
and estrone.[1]
Levels of estriol in women who are not pregnant are
almost undetectable.[3]
However, during pregnancy, estriol is synthesized in very high quantities by
the placenta
and is the most produced estrogen in the body by far,[3][4]”
it is weakly estrogenic, but in the
presence estradiol, it is antiestrogenic.[8][9] Wiki 6/21. Thus E3 in the presence of E2 block the
acation
of E2 (estradiol) while causing the unpleasant side effects of pragnency.
[2]
“There
is weak evidence that the human body can convert its active ingredient. And
they are sometime not natural: diosgenin, the
plant
steroid, is chemically converted to produce several steroid and sold as
natural, see Wiki,
and for more on progesterone, Dr. Lee.
Moreover, these natural chemical are generally not tested on animals for
toxicity, or purified to remove other compounds in the plant extract. For a
big window on plant toxins see the work
of Prof. Bruce Ames, his links, very possible the
leading authority.
Testosterone
(TTT) for women: Cognitive function: “Effects of testosterone on
visual-spatial performance has been suggested by enhanced performance in
females exposed prenatally to excess androgens.
Women with higher scores on mental status had
significantly higher total and bio-available testosterone levels.” (Moffat). In a study of women 55-88 years of age, those
with the higher levels of TTT
adjusted for age performed significantly
better.
Sexual desire: “Compared with placebo, women
receiving the 300-µg/dL testosterone patch had significantly greater increases
from baseline in sexual
desire (67% vs 48%; P = .05) and in
frequency of satisfying sexual
activity (79% vs 43%; P = .049).” Vaginal estrogen creams
and TTT
reverse vaginal atrophy. Mood elevation: “The positive-well-being, depressed-mood, and composite
scores of the Psychological General Well-Being Index also improved at the higher dose”. Concern over
masculinization is misplaced: the dose is insufficient and dihydrotestosterone (not
TTT) is responsible for masculinization. Women body builders use a very
high dose of
androgens. Third reason in the 80’s and
90’s there was widely marketed, mainly in Europe, a formulation of HRT with TTT
(instead of progestin), still sold
in the US as Estratest. TTT
is natural for women since about
10% of their estradiol is converted to TTT
(and the converse for men producing estradiol). TTT
patch for women is available. See the 6 pages on
HRT for list of benefits,
especially for natural HRT of
estradiol and progesterone. If
wishing to increase muscle mass and sexual drive, I recommended for my wife 50
mgs pf TTT. Higher if she had
wanted to increase muscle mass, and half that, 25 mgs in a compounded
lotion for
hormonal replacement. Lotions supply
only about 10% of the sex hormones, and 30% vaginally.
^^^^^^^ Non-technical
summation
^^^^^^^^
Natural Estrogen (Estradiol) with
progesterone NHRT: What
every woman should be taking because of the numerous, major health benefits,
benefits that would slash pharma’s profits.
Of the 4 natural estrogens only estradiol (E2) has major health
benefits. Two--estriol (E3) and estetrol
(E4)--are found in pregnant women and block
estradiol. Unfortunately for women, the
addition of E3 to E2 (estradiol) in compounded formulas has made the computer
of physicians and is commonly included in the prescription. This inclusion blocks
the positive effects
and increases side effects—more workings of pharma’s KOLs. Big pharma being
against hormone replacement therapy (HRT) markets ineffective products including
those containing estriol and estetrol, and estradiol at too low a dose &
with inferior progestins such as in the best-selling Prempro. Prempro, a combination of estrogen derived
from pregnant mare’s urine and the progestin MPA. The biological effects
of mare’s estrogens
are different than human estrogen and MPA
blocks most of the positive effects of estrogen. Thus, the results of the
major WHI study
funded by the FDA apply only for Prempro[1]. Nevertheless, the FDA warns that HRT has only
one valid medical use, to manage hot flashes, and should be used at the lowest
dose for the shortest time. Thus pharma
has used marketing science & guidelines to overturn 4 decades of positive
results for HRT: Alzheimer’s 83%, Heart attacks 51%, Coronary Heart Disease 50%,
Colorectal Cancer 46%, Breast Cancer 73%, Thrombosis 8%, Macular Degeneration
65%, osteoporosis fractures 90%, & prevents arthritic join destruction, firmer
breasts, healthier skin (less wrinkles, thicker, 48% more
collagen), reduces hair loss, improved cognitive function, less
depression and mental illness, and a general feeling of well-being with increased
libido. These results occur
because estrogen & progesterone receptors set the body to “premenopausal”
maintenance. Tribal survival benefits from
elimination of the elderly, thus we have the reduction in testosterone and
estradiol to promote that end. The
lack of estradiol (and possible
progesterone) causes the precipitous decline in health of women after menopause.
Life extension with long-term NHRT is over 6 years, and twice that with a low sugar diet. Progesterone (P4), the major progestogen, is
similar to estrogen--they work together.
It has numerous benefits, while some of the
artificial progestins are clearly harmful (such as stimulating the growth of breast
cancer). “Synthetic progestins
often interact with and transactivate androgen,
mineralocorticoid, glucocorticoid or growth hormone receptors”, at
2008, and none have been adequately
researched as to side effects. Like testosterone, estradiol taken at higher
dose has more benefits (this is distinguished from oral estrogens which prevent
pregnancy by producing effects like in pregnancy, which is why a lower dose is
better tolerated.) A sufficient dose is
available only from a compounding
pharmacy (15 mg of estradiol plus 100 mg of progesterone) in a lotion obtained
per application (there is a 10% absorption rate with
topical hormones). For a month’s supply
have prepared 60 gram of lotion,
application of 1/4th teaspoon which is 2 grams. Apply
widely
as possible over the torso, back, shoulders, underarms, and face using
water and rubbing it in to promote better absorption. Ideal free-serum estradiol level
is 200-500 pmol/L. Plant
sources for HRT are not natural and are metabolized by the liver on first pass
from the digestive system. These hormone
mimics fail to perform well and have adverse consequences (see MPA above). The
mimic can occupy sites that estradiol would
go to and block its action. Doctors who
follow the Wiley Protocol are other methods of hormone balancing for post menopause
women are milking the insurance and patient, and it lacks convincing scientific
evidence.
“Current research shows that the transdermal
route of estradiol administration can also be advantageous for women with
diabetes, hypertension and other cardiovascular risk factors, as those risks
increase with advancing age.[4]
Wiki 2018, and at 2013.
“Oral HRT
is associated with an increased risk of venous
thromboembolism (VTE), gallbladder disease and possibly stroke. The increased
occurrence of all these events can be prevented by the use of the transdermal
route of estradiol administration; this route seems also advantageous for women
with diabetes, hypertension and other cardiovascular risk factors, and also
especially with advancing age” at. Tell your
physician you are aware
of risks and are convinced of benefits of NHRT
applied topically is safe; then give him a copy 2010 journal article.
Tell him you observed the benefits in a
friend & a relative and want the same.
Most doctors will comply with your
request.
Lotion from compounding pharmacy of 5 mg estriol and 100 mg of progesterone
[1] Prempro has been the leading selling
HRT
since the mid 40s in the US, and it still is.
The issues with MPA and mare’s urine estrogens has been known for
decades by scientist including those in the FDA as inferior of the other HRT
& natural HRT. Because of birth
control pills, HRT, and the possibility that an estrogen would protect men—as
it does women—from cardiovascular disease, there has been thousands of
published articles on the estrogen and progesterone family of hormones. Unfortunately
the FDA acts to promote
products for pharma while minimally regulating in the public’s interest—see
Consumer Report’s article,
and also.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Non-technical
summation ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Natural Estrogen (Estradiol) with
progesterone NHRT: What
every woman should be taking because of the numerous, major health benefits,
benefits that would slash pharma’s profits.
Of the 4 natural estrogens only estradiol (E2) has major health
benefits. Two--estriol (E3) and estetrol
(E4)--are found in pregnant women and block
estradiol. Unfortunately for women, the
addition of E3 to E2 (estradiol) in compounded formulas has made the computer
of physicians and is commonly included in the prescription. This inclusion blocks
the positive effects and
increases side effects—more workings of pharma’s KOLs. Big pharma
being against hormone replacement
therapy (HRT) markets ineffective products including those containing estriol
and estetrol, and estradiol at too low a dose & with inferior progestins such
as in the best-selling Prempro. Prempro,
a combination of estrogen derived from pregnant mare’s urine and the progestin
MPA. The biological effects of mare’s
estrogens are different than human estrogen and MPA blocks most of the positive effects
of estrogen. Thus the results of the major WHI study
funded by the FDA apply only for Prempro[1]. Nevertheless he FDA warns that HRT has only
one valid medical use, to manage hot flashes, and should be used at the lowest
dose for the shortest time. Thus pharma
has used marketing science & guidelines to overturn 4 decades of positive
results for HRT: Alzheimer’s 83%, Heart attacks 51%, Coronary Heart Disease 50%,
Colorectal Cancer 46%, Breast Cancer 73%, Thrombosis 8%, Macular Degeneration
65%, osteoporosis fractures 90%, & prevents arthritic join destruction, firmer
breasts, healthier skin (less wrinkles, thicker, 48% more
collagen), reduces hair loss, improved cognitive function, less
depression and mental illness, and a general feeling of well-being with increased
libido. These results occur
because estrogen & progesterone receptors set the body to “premenopausal”
maintenance. Tribal survival benefits
from elimination of the elderly, thus we have the reduction in testosterone and
estradiol to promote that end. The
lack of estradiol (and possible
progesterone) cause the precipitous decline in health of women after menopause.
Life extension with long-term NHRT is over 6 years, and twice that with a low sugar diet. Progesterone (P4), the major progestogen, is
similar to estrogen--they work together.
It has numerous benefits, while some of the
artificial progestins are clearly harmful (such as stimulating the growth of
breast cancer). “Synthetic
progestins often interact with and
transactivate androgen, mineralocorticoid, glucocorticoid or growth hormone
receptors”,
at
2008, and none have been adequately
researched as to side effects. Like testosterone, estradiol taken at higher
dose has more benefits (this is distinguished from oral estrogens which prevent
pregnancy by producing effects like in pregnancy, which is why a lower dose is
better tolerated.) A sufficient dose is
available only from a compounding
pharmacy (15 mg of estradiol plus 100 mg of progesterone) in a lotion obtained
per application (there is a 10% absorption rate with
topical hormones). For a month’s supply
have prepared 60 gram of lotion,
application of 1/4th teaspoon which is 2 grams. Apply
widely
as possible over the torso, back, shoulders, underarms, and face using
water and rubbing it in to promote better absorption. Ideal free-serum estradiol level
is 200-500 pmol/L. Plant
sources for HRT are not natural and are metabolized by the liver on first pass
from the digestive system. These hormone
mimics fail to perform well and have adverse consequences (see MPA above). The
mimic can occupy sites that estradiol
would go to and block its action.
Doctors who follow the Wiley Protocol are other methods of hormone
balancing for post menopause women are milking the insurance and patient, and
it lacks convincing scientific evidence.
“Current research shows that the
transdermal route of estradiol administration can also be advantageous for
women with diabetes, hypertension and other cardiovascular risk factors, as
those risks increase with advancing age.[4]
Wiki 2018, and at 2013.
“Oral HRT
is associated with an increased risk of venous
thromboembolism (VTE), gallbladder disease and possibly stroke. The increased
occurrence of all these events can be prevented by the use of the transdermal
route of estradiol administration; this route seems also advantageous for women
with diabetes, hypertension and other cardiovascular risk factors, and also
especially with advancing age” at. Tell your
physician you are aware
of risks and are convinced of benefits of NHRT
applied topically is safe; then give him a copy 2010 journal article.
Tell him you observed the benefits in a
friend & a relative and want the same.
Most doctors will comply with your
request.
[1]
Prempro has been the leading selling HRT since the mid 40s in the US,
and it still is. The issues with MPA and
mare’s urine estrogens has been known for decades by scientist including those
in the FDA as inferior of the other HRT & natural HRT. Because of birth
control pills, HRT, and the
possibility that an estrogen would protect men—as it does women—from
cardiovascular disease, there has been thousands of published articles on the
estrogen and progesterone family of hormones.
Unfortunately the FDA acts to promote products for pharma while
minimally regulating in the public’s interest—see Consumer Report’s article, and also.
Why Natural HRT, which estrogens, higher dose, and non-sequential
There are 4 superior choices
for natural hormone replacement
therapy (NHRT). 1) that of
estradiol and progesterone; 2) a
sequential uses of those hormone to mimic the women’s premenopausal cycle; 3)
to take all 3 natural estrogens plus
progesterone[1], and 4)
to take them sequentially. What is the
evidence to support these choices?
Unfortunately, dispositive quality evidence is lacking: no long-term
clinical trials; nor are there
short-term clinical trials. The reason
is simple, the profit margin in insufficient on off patent drugs to justify
such trials. Products natural to the
body cannot be patented (with a few exceptions). Contributing factor: in the golden age of medicine, when there was
still significant amount of university ran and clinical trials with just mere
funding by pharma, progesterone was available only as a topical cream (not
orally active). Today that has changed,
and like CoQ10 it is available in an oil based capsule micronized. For these
reasons the evidence for NHRT is mainly anecdotal. The second source for evidence is population
studies (epidemiological), but nearly all of them have a major flaw, they
gather the evidence from all women on HRT, independent of formulation. A few
epidemiological studies separate women
according to type of products, & a few clinical trials are for one product.[2] These provide evidence suggestive that 1 of
the 4 choices could be better.
So why do I favor # 1), non-sequential progesterone
with estradiol?
First, estradiol has been used in a number of preparations with
excellent results. In the French
epidemiological study (EN3) estrogen showed no increase in breast cancer; &
Prempro the greatest increase (due to the progestin MPA). E3N
study supports the use with estrogen with progesterone and not a
progestin. Second progesterone and
estradiol work together in the body, thus to use a synthetic form, called a progestin,
has consistently resulted in lower benefits—see MPA example above. Third,
for those using a better progestins,
their results were superior to using only estradiol, ethinyl estradiol, and
esterified estrogen[3],
this favors the combination NHRT. Fourth
those who used estradiol and testosterone (common in Europe in the 1980-90s)
instead of synthetic progestin had very good results; this also supports the
use of progesterone. Fifth, there is no
clinical evidence supporting comparable benefits from the other forms of
estrogen comparable to those from estradiol; this supports the use of estradiol. Sixth,
the laboratory work testing with
estradiol indicates that it is the most important of the 4 estrogens. Seventh
in the Danish study of the sequential
high-dose (tri-cyclic) Trisekvens[4]
(a product only available in Europe), the results were excellent. Eight, compliance
issue because of mild side
effects of nausea and break-through bleeding like those of a menstrual
period. Ninth, the paucity of evidence
supporting for postmenopausal women a need for having cyclic hormones[5]. Tenth, cyclic NHRT would
cost more and is less convenient to take. Eleventh, if I in recommended sequential,
some woman would find a doctor who charges many times more for monitoring blood
hormone levels and providing a custom balanced hormone cocktail based on her
blood work. This lacks sound
science. Conclusion: Thus recommend
#1, NHRT of estradiol with progesterone from a compounding pharmacy, 2
mg estradiol and 100 mg of micronized progesterone in oil as a capsule.
[1]
Dr. Jonathan V. Wright in Natural
Hormone Replacement (1997) recommends
all 3 hormones.
[2]
Note, the large
trials government funded trials (HERS
and WHI) are designed to show HRT as
dangerous, since pharma opposes for business reason HRT.
[3]
Esterified estrogen and ethinyl estradiol are commonly used instead of
estradiol because of longer half-life--still available. They are
derivatives of estradiol, of which for
esterified estrogen there are over 30--a way for pharma to obtain patents of
exclusivity. I consider these 2
equivalent to estradiol, though some of these forms must be inferior.
[4] The women in the treated group with
an intact uterus started treatment with 2 mg synthetic 17-β-estradiol for 12
days, 2 mg 17-β-estradiol plus 1 mg norethisterone acetate for 10 days, and 1
mg 17-β-estradiol for six days (Trisekvens;
Novo Nordisk, Denmark).
http://www.bmj.com/content/345/bmj.e6409?etoc=
. “Because of break-through
bleeding
with sequential Trisekvens, non-sequential
combined HRT form of Trisekvens was better received.” At.
[5]
Over 95% of HRT products are not sequential and the literature does not indicate
an associated problems. Nor are
the
benefits exceptional favorable from sequential Nordisc compared to the best of
epidemiological studies.
Why the higher
dose of estradiol? This is comparable to that used in Trisekvens
which had excellent results. In the
1960s through the 1980s the higher dose of estradiol was the norm, and during
that period the numerous benefits were uncovered in epidemiological studies;
thus higher dose is better. Second, in
men higher dose testosterone[1]
has significantly greater health benefits, more evidence for a higher dose of
estradiol. Third, pharma in their
opposition to these healthful hormones recommends the lowest dose, still more
evidence that the higher is better.
Why natural?
The goals is to restore youthful benefits and avoid age related
conditions, thus to restore hormones to youthful levels. Natural products have
evolved to work in the
body through receptors and complex feedback systems; thus synthetic chemicals don’t
function as well. Natural hormones have
lower risk of side effect (for which the reporting system is broken)[2]. Of the over 100 synthetic hormones, there is
no evidence that they work better, and only one has very good results in a
clinical trial—unfortunately the Danish product is not licensed in the US.
Why not branded drugs
for HRT? With the support of the NIH, pharma
opposes HRT since 1990s, thus current products have various issues: 1) dose
is too low for most of the healthful
benefits; viz. not equivalent to 2 mg of estradiol. Fernhrt has only .25 mcg
of ethinyl estradiol
(1/8th the recommended 2 mg).
Estragyn (estrone) is a 0.1 gm vaginal cream; but estrone is far less
bioactive than estradiol, and the absorption rate is under 25%. 2) A
number of products are not estrogen, but estrogen antagonists (they occupy
estrogen receptors on the cells and thus block estradiol’s action). Tamoxifen
is one of several estrogen
antagonists marketed as HRT. 3) Estrogens
with harmful progestins: Femhrt has the progestin norethindrone acetate, and
Prempro has the progestin MPA. 4) Use
less bioactive estrogens such as estrone, estriol, derivatives of the
estrogens, and mare’s estrogen in Premarin.
5) For hot flashes several tranquilizers of the SSRI and dopamine
agonist types have been approved, and many more are used off-label.
Problem of
finding a doctor who will prescribe HRT as recommended. Be prepared with
an answer when
your doctor suggests that you try something else first. You can refer to books, such as Natural
Hormone Replacement (the Amazon reviews has good material). Ask him to
read an article in Menopause Internal Journal which I have pasted with link. Refer to the experience of friends, or other
articles you have read. And you
can
simply tell him that the 40 years of positive journal literature was not
overturned by the flaw Women’s Health Initiative Study (WHI) which used
estrogen from mare’s urine along with MPA as a progestin, which has been known
to block some of the benefits of estrogen and increase risk for breast cancer.
Nearly all
doctors have fallen for the anti-HRT myths:
promotes breast cancer, and benefits aren’t worth the risks. As argued at HRT, this is false for NHRT
and most formulations of HRT. Thus
to
get HRT or NHRT long-term (not just
for hot flashes) requires a physician who is willing to do what once was the
norm before 2002. The earlier studies
on
HRT were not wrong. I about 3/4th
of doctors will write a prescription for NHRT
for their regular patient after lecturing on the risks and a referral for a
mammogram.[3]
He is protecting himself from possible
litigation. Copy this 2010 journal article Ten
Reasons to be Happy About Hormone Replacement Therapy: A Guide for Patients to
MS word and print it. Read it before
seeing him, and give him a copy. These hormones
are part of nature’s clock for us to die in the 7th decade. The
low
estradiol & progesterone is the reason for the precipitous decline in
health of women after menopause. Sending
a message to your body that you are premenstrual; it is worth the effort to jump through a
few of pharma’s hoops.
Progestins are
of uncertain effects: The use of progestins, in particular medroxyprogesterone
acetate,
in treating
post-menopausal symptoms have been associated with increased risk of blood
clots[45] and breast
cancer in a study carried out by the Women's
Health Initiative.
While the
study did not involve dydrogesterone, it is possible, but not certain, that it
too increases these risks.[46] [The blood clots a key risk factor for MI,
explains why with Prempro used in the WHI) there was no reduction in MI—while
with other formulas of HRT the reduction is 35% or greater. The WHI has a second
flaw in that of 55%
equine estrogen, which is of uncertain consequences, thus the estrogen alone
arm of the study is applies only to Premarin —jk.] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dydrogesterone
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378512203003463
Abstract
Our in vitro results indicate that not all progestogens act
equally on breast cancer cells. Some progestogens (medroxyprogesterone acetate
(MPA),
norethisterone acetate (NETA) and dienogest) alone or
combined with estradiol (E2) stimulate proliferation of breast cancer cells,
while others (dihydrodydrogesterone (DHD), the active metabolite of
dydrogesterone, tibolone and progesterone (Prog)) alone or combined with
estradiol induce apoptosis [prevents cancer]. Further pharmacological and clinical
studies
should be initiated to evaluate these findings in vivo.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
The
women in the treated group with an intact uterus started treatment with 2 mg
synthetic 17-β-estradiol for 12 days, 2 mg 17-β-estradiol plus 1 mg
norethisterone acetate for 10 days, and 1 mg 17-β-estradiol for six days (Trisekvens;
Novo Nordisk, Denmark). http://www.bmj.com/content/345/bmj.e6409?etoc=
. “Because of break-through bleeding
with sequential Trisekvens, non-sequential
combined HRT form of Trisekvens was better received.” At.
[1] Testosterone is structurally
the same as
estradiol but for one group on the molecule.
In the body women convert some of their estradiol to testosterone so
that there level is about 1/10 that of a man’s.
Men convert some of their testosterone to estradiol.
[2] Progestins are of uncertain effects:
The use of progestins, in particular medroxyprogesterone
acetate, in treating post-menopausal
symptoms have been associated with increased risk of blood clots[45] and breast cancer in a study
carried out by the Women's
Health Initiative. While the study
did not involve dydrogesterone, it is possible, but not certain, that it too
increases these risks.[46] [The blood clots a key risk
factor for MI,
explains why with Prempro used in the WHI) there was no reduction in MI—while
with other formulas of HRT the reduction is 35% or greater. The WHI has a second flaw in that of 55% equine
estrogen, which is of uncertain value, thus the estrogen alone arm of the study
is applies only to Premarin —jk.] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dydrogesterone
[3] Men have a similar
problem in obtaining a
testosterone of sufficient dose, which entails using a compounding
pharmacy.
|